# Opinions on **Natural number**

Here you have a list of opinions about Natural number and you can also give us your opinion about it.You will see other people's opinions about Natural number and you will find out what the others say about it.

Also, you will see opinions about other terms. Do not forget to leave your opinion about this topic and others related.

In mathematics, the **natural numbers** (sometimes called the **whole numbers**) are those used for counting (as in "there are *six* coins on the table") and ordering (as in "this is the *third* largest city in the country"). In common language, words used for counting are "cardinal numbers" and words used for ordering are "ordinal numbers".

Another use of natural numbers is for what linguists call nominal numbers, such as the model number of a product, where the "natural number" is used only for naming (as distinct from a serial number where the order properties of the natural numbers distinguish later uses from earlier uses) and generally lacks any meaning of *number* as used in mathematics.

The natural numbers are the basis from which many other number sets may be built by extension: the integers, by including an unresolved negation operation; the rational numbers, by including with the integers an unresolved division operation; the real numbers by including with the rationals the termination of Cauchy sequences; the complex numbers, by including with the real numbers the unresolved square root of minus one; the hyperreal numbers, by including with real numbers the infinitesimal value epsilon; vectors, by including a vector structure with reals; matrices, by having vectors of vectors; the nonstandard integers; and so on. Therefore, the natural numbers are canonically embedded (identified) in the other number systems.

Properties of the natural numbers, such as divisibility and the distribution of prime numbers, are studied in number theory. Problems concerning counting and ordering, such as partitioning and enumerations, are studied in combinatorics.

There is no universal agreement about whether to include zero in the set of natural numbers. Some authors begin the natural numbers with 0, corresponding to the **non-negative integers** 0, 1, 2, 3, ..., whereas others start with 1, corresponding to the **positive integers** 1, 2, 3, .... This distinction is of no fundamental concern for the natural numbers (even when viewed via additional axioms as semigroup with respect to addition and monoid for multiplication). Including the number 0 just supplies an identity element for the former (binary) operation to achieve a monoid structure for both, and a (trivial) zero divisor for the multiplication.

In common language, for example in primary school, natural numbers may be called **counting numbers** to distinguish them from the real numbers which are used for measurement.

In the image below, you can see a graph with the evolution of the times that people look for Natural number. And below it, you can see how many pieces of news have been created about Natural number in the last years.

Thanks to this graph, we can see the interest Natural number has and the evolution of its popularity.

# What do you think of Natural number?

You can leave your opinion about Natural number here as well as read the comments and opinions from other people about the topic.It's important that all of us leave our opinions about Natural number to have a better knowledge about it: