# Opinions on **Invariant mass**

Here you have a list of opinions about Invariant mass and you can also give us your opinion about it.You will see other people's opinions about Invariant mass and you will find out what the others say about it.

Also, you will see opinions about other terms. Do not forget to leave your opinion about this topic and others related.

The **invariant mass**, **rest mass**, **intrinsic mass**, **proper mass,** or (in the case of bound systems or objects observed in their center of momentum frame) simply **mass,** is a characteristic of the total energy and momentum of an object or a system of objects that is the same in all frames of reference related by Lorentz transformations. If a center of momentum frame exists for the system, then the invariant mass of a system is simply the total energy divided by the speed of light squared. In other reference frames, the energy of the system increases, but system momentum is subtracted from this, so that the invariant mass remains unchanged.

Systems whose four-momentum is a null vector (for example a single photon or many photons moving in exactly the same direction) have zero invariant mass, and are referred to as *massless*. A physical object or particle moving faster than the speed of light would have space-like four-momenta (such as the hypothesized tachyon), and these do not appear to exist. Any time-like four-momentum possesses a reference frame where the momentum (3-dimensional) is zero, which is a center of momentum frame. In this case, invariant mass is positive and is referred to as the rest mass.

If objects within a system are in relative motion, then the invariant mass of the whole system will differ from the sum of the objects' rest masses. This is also equal to the total energy of the system divided by *c*. See massâ€“energy equivalence for a discussion of definitions of mass. Since the mass of systems must be measured with a weight or mass scale in a center of momentum frame in which the entire system has zero momentum, such a scale always measures the system's invariant mass. For example, a scale would measure the kinetic energy of the molecules in a bottle of gas to be part of invariant mass of the bottle, and thus also its rest mass. The same is true for massless particles in such system, which add invariant mass and also rest mass to systems, according to their energy.

For an isolated *massive* system, the center of mass of the system moves in a straight line with a steady sub-luminal velocity (with a velocity depending on the reference frame used to view it). Thus, an observer can always be placed to move along with it. In this frame, which is the center of momentum frame, the total momentum is zero, and the system as a whole may be thought of as being "at rest" if it is a bound system (like a bottle of gas). In this frame, which always exists, the invariant mass of the system is equal to the total system energy (in the zero-momentum frame) divided by *c*. This total energy in the center of momentum frame, is the **minimum** energy which the system may be observed to have, when seen by various observers from various inertial frames.

Note that for reasons above, such a rest frame does not exist for single photons, or rays of light moving in one direction. When two or more photons move in different directions, however, a center of mass frame (or "rest frame" if the system is bound) exists. Thus, the mass of a system of several photons moving in different directions is positive, which means that an invariant mass exists for this system even though it does not exist for each photon.

In the image below, you can see a graph with the evolution of the times that people look for Invariant mass. And below it, you can see how many pieces of news have been created about Invariant mass in the last years.

Thanks to this graph, we can see the interest Invariant mass has and the evolution of its popularity.

# What do you think of Invariant mass?

You can leave your opinion about Invariant mass here as well as read the comments and opinions from other people about the topic.It's important that all of us leave our opinions about Invariant mass to have a better knowledge about it: